SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Proof that John Kerry is Unfit for Command

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: KLP who wrote (8599)9/9/2004 9:58:44 AM
From: cirrus  Read Replies (1) of 27181
 
Saddam was not a good person.

However, let me put it to you this way: If you were told that Iraq did not have WMD, that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, that removing a secular Saddam would open up decades of repressed ethnic hostility and the possibility of a radical Islamic government in Iraq, and that doing so would cost $300 billion and 1,500 American lives, would you still favor invading Iraq?

George Bush Sr. made the wise decision when he wanted no part of occupying Iraq.

I remember all the reasons given by my government for fighting the bad, god-hating communist North Vietnamese at a cost of 50,000 dead - after the French bailed out, by the way. Well, that same North Vietnamese government is a now a favored trading partner of ours. The Bush administration is pulling the same nonsense in justifying the Iraqi war... in time we will look back and ask "What were we thinking?"

As one Iraqi said: "Before the war we had one Saddam... now we have many Saddams."
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext