SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: aladin who wrote (68660)9/9/2004 8:14:47 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) of 793602
 
I used to visit my mother at work sometimes in the early 1970's. She used a Linotype machine. Those were enormous, spitting out chunks of hot metal into a bucket.

Then she switched to the Compugraphic in the late 1970's, which was a nasty machine but at least not hot metal, and was much smaller. Nasty because the typesetters never cleaned them out. I would call it "giving the machine an enema" but it kept the machine from putting out crap, not vice versa.

I did not set much type, mostly layout, pasteup and prepress, but could use a manual Varityper, very clean but an absolute bear to correct.

People would probably realize how different type faces are if they trying waxing the paper and pasting on corrections, so they could see what happens when the lines were a little bit further apart or the type was a little bit bigger.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News