SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: one_less who wrote (22549)9/9/2004 8:43:22 PM
From: Kevin Rose   of 173976
 
When we do it ourselves, we end up footing the entire bill and letting other nations off the hook. We need a mechanism where responsible nations will chip in their resources, as they did in Bosnia and Iraq I, to help with the cause. Not only does it make such an endeavor feasible, costwise, but it also lends legitimacy to the intent.

But, rather than the one-off coalition building of Bush 41, we need a means. Is the UN no longer a possibility? If so, do we build a new coalition that is semi-permanent, from nations that are serious about dealing with terrorist states and humanitarian crises? If so, we'd have to relinquish at least some laterism, to coin a word, so that these nations felt that they had a say in the decision making.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News