Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (68702)	9/9/2004 10:44:37 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) of 793574

Blogosphere Asking the Wrong question Wizbang I keep seeing people saying that Dan Rather and CBS need to come clean and say who looked at the documents and said they looked legit. Forget that. Dan Blather is an idiot and 60 minutes had no credibility left to lose. The question that needs to be asked is who forged the documents? It was either someone in the DNC or the Kerry campaign itself. Which one? Who gave them to CBS? Who tipped CBS of their existence? Fontgate will undoubtedly be compared to Watergate. In fact, I've already seen it. That analogy always comes up and it is tired and overworked. At least this scandal does have some resemblance to Watergate. 7 weeks before a Presidential election Democrat operatives forged documents to smear a sitting President. Forgetting the iffy analogy, we need to focus on the fact the Democrats forged documents to try to steal the election. The anger should not be aimed at Dan Rather but rather at the Democratic party and/or the Kerry campaign. Forget Dan Rather- the question is... What did Terry Mcauliffe know and when did he know it?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next