What Did Kerry Know, and When Did He Know It?
Blogs for Bush
<font size=4>
Lets take a moment to consider the main issue now arising from the forged memos that CBS used in its report the other day. The documents were forged as reports here, here, here and here indicate. What does it all mean?
Well, first off, it means that the campaign against President Bush has reached a new low and, also, the people opposed to the President have now proven conclusively that there are no depths they wont plumb. We GOPers could start up a cottage industry, and make a few of Soros' bucks, by creating a whole slew of forged anti-Bush documents - the Donk's and their media allies are too twisted by stupid hate to question them.
Secondly, and most importantly, it leads us to this question: Where did the forgeries come from? They didn't appear out of thin air; someone made them. Reports indicate that CBS had them for at least a couple weeks before they aired their story on 60 Minutes II (Motto: Twice the BS of Regular CBS Broadcasts). One pundit claims to have been been told by an un-named DNC staffer that an opposition researcher passed to the documents to the Kerry campaign which then turned them over to CBS (which would make sense as CBS has proven itself the most reliably anti-Bush in its reporting; if you were part of the Kerry campaign, CBS would be the place to leak oppo research to).
There is, at this time, no proof that the Kerry campaign had a hand in this but an investigation must be launched immediately. The American people have a right to know if a man who could soon be President was involved in this scandal. We need to ask:
What did Kerry know, and when did he know it? |
