<font color=blue>"Like I said, 60 minutes released the documents and so did the whitehouse. If you're going to give one of them hell over it why not both of them. I'm asking you this question.
You sure do make pretty messages. Is there a reason for all the different colors and stuff?"<font color=black>
Apparently you see the pretty colors, but forgot to read
the words. If you had read them, you too would know I have
already completely debunked your banal hypothetical in
this post.........
Message 20514620
Bottom line. The White house never had those documents in
their possession prior to late last week.
The forged documents allegedly came from someone's "personal"
files.
The White House received those documents from CBS just
prior to CBS airing of their fraudulent SMEAR JOB by Dan
Rather & then the WH released them the following day "in
what is said was the interest of full disclosure".
The White House would have been foolish to attempt to
attack the authenticity of those forged documents. The
blogosphere & now the mainstream media (MSM) are doing a
great job on their own. Why get the MSM to turn their
sights back on the WH?
CBS' so called "expert"<font size=4>....Moore, however, simply asserts
that the documents are real and that the lack of a White
House statement discrediting the documents (yet) shows
that <font color=blue>"the White House probably knows that these
documents are, in fact, real."<font color=red>
Uh, no. That statement is meaningless. By that standard, I
can assert that the fact that Ed Bradley, Mike Wallace,
Morley Safer and the rest of the Sunday 60 Minutes crew
haven't come to defend Rather means they "probably know
that these documents are, in fact, fake, and so badly done
that a third-grader could recognize the differences
between a document created with a typewriter and one
created on a modern computer, and that Rather has gone
cuckoo for cocoa puffs."
<font color=black>
Right now, the camp that believes the documents are the
real deal consists of Dan Rather, Jim Moore, Tom Harkin,
and possibly Terry McAuliffe, although the DNC head also
apparently thinks Karl Rove did it.<font size=3> |
