SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (69516)9/12/2004 11:21:39 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) of 793931
 
I do think that people who have run out of acceptable and promising options will (and should) consider fighting dirty. To overtly refuse on principle to use dirty tactics as a last resort is fine, but to refuse to entertain the option is either weak or unpatriotic.


You're confusing 'fighting dirty' with 'rejoicing in death and destruction'. Many hard-pressed guerilla movements do fight sneaky and dirty - but they fight against military targets to achieve political aims. It takes the more utopian movements like anarchism or islamism to decide that death for death's sake is a wonderful thing and will lead somehow to the paradise on earth they seek. People who want liberty do not fight by killing schoolchildren because those means would destroy the very ends they seek.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News