Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TigerPaw who wrote (55507)	9/12/2004 4:35:15 PM
From: Gersh Avery	Read Replies (1) of 89467

OK .. I broke down and read the article that you linked to .. "So, let's dispense with the "proportional type" theory. I've looked at the PDF files, and IMO the quality thereof is too far removed from the original (the wavy baselines are a dead giveaway) to know what the original type proportion was. " This "expert" can't look at the documents and determine if it's a proportional or non-proportional font????? Yet at the same time believes they are not forged. pure left wing propaganda with no real examination at all. Let's start with these questions for typewriter experts: What year was the first Times New Roman ball produced for the Selectric? How many were produced? Would Killians office to have likely had one? Did the Times New Roman font ball have the smaller superscript characters? If such a ball existed, what year was it first produced? Someone at IBM should have this information.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next