Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: unclewest who wrote (55548)	9/12/2004 10:11:00 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (2) of 89467

The PO Box is wrong and the third line is missing. I don't see how that points to a forgery. First of all, I don't know that the P.O. Box is wrong, only that it is different. That may just mean that it winds up in a slightly different office of the same base. If so, that matches up perfectly with the idea that the headers are put on by whatever clerk is setting up supplies for that office. It doesn't match up with any theory that the items were computer generated. Those headers would have been an easy cut & paste. Once again, a separate special explaination has to be proposed for why the forger would try to trick out the header, and not the font. I recall using the Xerox in the public library for high school papers. I remember helping my older sister xerox some pictures for a term paper. In those days you had to put a screen over the picture to pixelate the image. That would have been about 1966 or 1967. At any rate, there are many ways they might have put their specific P.O. on the forms, including memographs. TP <font color=red>Edit - 5 by 5 Grub.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next