Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: unclewest who wrote (55586)	9/13/2004 12:41:58 AM
From: upanddown	Read Replies (1) of 89467

Another thing we should be talking about. Forget the detail for now. Are the forms conceded to be correct and consistent with the version of the forms used in the applicable period? Anyone who has worked in a large organization knows that forms are modified frequently and new versions are constantly appearing and the old versions disappearing. Are these the forms used as of the date on the documents? Can they be compared with reviews of other pilots in the same time period for consistency? If the forms are authentic, then the forgery charge is bogus since the BLANK EARLY-70's VERSION of the forms has unquestionably disappeared into the dustbin of history. If they are not authentic, how was the boilerplate created? Would this elaborate forgery have involved re-creating the applicable version of the forms (presumably from authentic reviews of the same period) and then make the comically stupid mistake of doing it on WORD????? Another question is if these documents are bogus, why isn't the Bush campaign going ballistic?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next