Two posts from Captain Ed
Another Clintonista Comes Aboard Hair France
The John Kerry campaign announced another addition to its advisory staff -- Mike McCurry, the former Clinton press secretary whose tenure preceded Joe Lockhart's, another recent addition. In a petty cruelty, Kerry's increasingly overshadowed and overmatched communications director Stephanie Cutter made the announcement:
Sen. John Kerry on Tuesday added Bill Clinton's former press secretary, Mike McCurry, to his campaign, picking up yet another adviser who worked for the two-time Democratic presidential winner. McCurry will travel with Kerry as a non-paid senior adviser for the final weeks of the campaign.
One senior Kerry aide said McCurry will help keep the candidate's comments focused on his daily message. Another said his role will be to make sure the traveling press corps knows what Kerry is doing and why. Either way, the hiring is an acknowledgment that Kerry and his team have failed to communicate a concise, persuasive argument. McCurry starts Wednesday.
It would appear to me that these were the same tasks for which they selected Joe Lockhart, and the same duties that Cutter should have had as communication director. Does Kerry really need that many minders in order to stay on message? Do they plan on tackling him at the knees if he starts to mention Iraq or Viet Nam again? During the Reagan administration, Democrats sneered at Reagan and his "handlers", but they're hiring them by the score in Boston these days.
Of course, when your favorable ratings plummet 18 points in five weeks and land you somewhere below Martha Stewart and Vladimir Putin, you have serious problems. However, communications is hardly the issue, as Kerry himself has demonstrated by holing himself up since the convention and refusing to be interviewed until this week. After chiding George Bush for not holding enough press conferences as President (which must be anathema to the vain Bostonian), Kerry has refused to take a live question from any mainstream reporter, preferring to take questions only from Comedy Central's Jon Stewart and MTV. For someone this reticent, one press secretary really ought to be enough, and even at that it would only have to be a part-time job.
But congratulations to Mr. McCurry anyway on his new position. Let us know when you can induce your new client to come out from behind the sofa.
Addendum: In all fairness, Drudge cut off the list from the Washington Post's Dana Milbank before the end. Kerry did outpoll such luminaries as Pete Rose, Rush Limbaugh, Joseph McCarthy (barely), and O. J. Simpson.
Posted by Captain Ed at 12:45 PM | Comments (7) | TrackBack (0)
IAEA Dithers
After the US finally started talking tough about Iran's nuclear research and development and the EU stiffened its own backbone this past week, the focus shifted to the International Atomic Energy Agency for completion of its investigation and inspection of Iranian nuclear efforts. The West seems to agree in principle to a deadline of October 31 for Iranian compliance with its non-proliferation responsibilities.
The IAEA, on the other hand, argues that deadlines are meaningless altogether, revealing the uselessness of the agency and its head, Mohammed ElBaradei, in combating proliferation and its connections to terrorism:
The head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency said Tuesday that he cannot guarantee his probe of Iran's suspect nuclear activities will be complete by November, the deadline sought by the United States and its European allies.
Mohamed ElBaradei, the chief of the International Atomic Energy Agency, also repeated that his investigation has not definitely established whether Iran is trying to make nuclear weapons — as Washington asserts.
"We haven't seen any concrete proof that there is a weapons program," he told reporters. "Can we say everything is peaceful? Obviously we are not at that stage." ... While ElBaradei said it was up to the board to decide whether to set a deadline, "we cannot just say there is a magic date."
"There is no artificial deadline where I can say, 'in November everything will be completed,'" he said.
Well, after two years, when do we get some answers? This is exactly like the Iraqi weapons "inspections", which were originally designed to ensure and document compliance, not turn international bureaucrats into a bunch of Barnaby Jones wannabes. Instead of reporting the lack of transparency and cooperation and putting the effort back into the hands of the negotiators, the agency instead argues for a perpetual inspection regime that will find nothing and do nothing.
We've had ample evidence of Iranian violations of the treaty, and all indications are that the Iranians are well on their way to constructing a nuclear weapon. Even the IAEA has said that Iran has been playing games with the inspectors; France admits that Iran has cheated the system; hell, even Iran admitted it lied to the IAEA about violations. How many more provocations will it take for ElBaradei to write his report?
ElBaradei and the reliance on bureaucracts outside the loop of any responsibility is symptomatic of the world's response to terror and nuclear blackmail. The prevailing wisdom seems to be to do just enough to be seen doing something while giving lifetime jobs to anyone who is willing to never reach a conclusion. It's the same strategy that led to the twelve-year Iraqi quagmire, and all it does is postpone the inevitable. These days, and especially in Iran, the time wasted by the West is put to good use by the fanatics.
Stalemates never hold, and only those who are willing to take action wind up gaining the edge. Iran has been the only party in this multilateral chicken dance with the willingness to act, encouraged by the West's dithering. The time for vacillation has long since passed, and if ElBaradei and the IAEA can't figure out how to set a deadline, then their usefulness is at an end. |
