>>>>>> As opposed to the principles of massive deficits, massive soldiers deaths, failed policy on every level.
The fact is I disagree about these things. Massive deficits? Duh. We're at war, we were hit hard on 9/11, he inherited a horrible economy which it was necessary for him to use measures to get us out of. The economy is in fine shape today because of Bush's stamina in pushing through tax cuts. There is one way out of deficits -- you grow your way out of them. All knowledgeable economists realize this.
The soldier deaths, while unfortunate, are not massive by any measure. And these deaths test the "principles" of the man who sent them there. While Kerry has been on every side (and the middle) of this war, Bush has been steadfast. I know it isn't what YOU want, but the reality is that is what leadership is about. You can't have a Bill Clinton who changes his mind based on the politics of the situation, running a war.
I have no Republican dogma. I'm not a Republican. Not a Democrat. I'll be voting for a Republican for President but may well vote for a Dem. for Senate and Governor. But it is a fact that the extreme liberals, like Kerry, Kennedy, and Hillary, are bad for our country in every respect. I know this, and I would never vote for one of them.
For the most part, Republicans bring to the table more honesty, integrity, and leadership than Democrats. There are exceptions. But Kerry isn't one of them. He is sorry, and the fact that the Dems ran him is unfortunate.
When you talk about my "dogma", it is laughable -- since you've been defending Rather's fraud to try and support Kerry. What kind of "dogma" is THAT? Follow the lead of liberal Pat Caddell, who, whilst a Democrat and liberal, has enough honor about him to stand up and call a spade a spade. |
