Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (70325)	9/15/2004 8:36:48 AM
From: gamesmistress	Read Replies (1) of 793999

You mean "definitive" evidence, which is what Dan Rather demands as proof of forgery for the memos? :-) We don't have all the pieces of the puzzle yet, and won't til we know where those memos came from. We do know that 60 Minutes (meaning Dan Rather and Mary Mapes) have been working on this "story" about Bush's NG records & performance for at least 4 years and that Don Hewitt shot it down, saying there wasn't enough to support it. Then these memos showed up and used as the basis for a 60 Minutes story last week. A DNC video on the same subject just came out this week. Both projects had to have a good deal of lead time to produce, plenty of time for the memos to be authenticated, but every "expert" CBS has produced has either backed off or been shot down. Yet CBS still insists the memos are genuine and won't name the source. No internal investigation, either. Is this "proof" that CBS concocted the fraud as opposed to being too eager and unskeptical about one offered to them? No, but it makes the circumstances under which CBS (and the DNC too, don't forget) was offered just what they wanted to hear somewhat suspicious.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next