Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (70456)	9/15/2004 1:56:03 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) of 794309

At the risk of triggering a nuance-allergy-reaction, I submit that it's possible to regard the documents as frauds without rushing to judgment that Rather or anyone else at CBS was behind the fraud. You can believe that CBS was hoodwinked only until you hear about the the authentication shopping. If it turns out that CBS deliberately gave only a single document to 6 experts and 5 said, 'phony as hell' but the 6th said, 'the signature looks okay', and they went with the 6th and suppressed mention of the other 5, then we are not talking about innocent dupes any more.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next