SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (70468)9/15/2004 2:07:27 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) of 794162
 
I am saying that CBS's actions made them complicit in the promotion of the forgery. They had evidence that they weren't true, and ignored it.

And so we're back to what "they" means.

Certainly somebody at CBS had some indication that they might not be the real thing. We don't KNOW who that was or how they came to proceed despite it. We don't KNOW that anyone "knew" they were bogus. All we KNOW is that some experts have said that they suggested problems to someone there. There are all sorts of possibilities for what came next.

I am saying that CBS's actions made them complicit in the promotion of the forgery.

That language is fine with me. Whether they knowingly promoted a fraud or whether they were blinded by their bias or incompetence, they were complicit is in all likelihood a forgery.

As usual, I'm not arguing against anything more that the zealous assertion that we KNOW that CBS (or anyone in CBS) intentionally perpetrated a fraud, which is where I started.

Sorry for any boredom that ensued. <g>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News