SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jttmab who wrote (145667)9/15/2004 2:21:36 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
"I agree with the Kurdish north; I hesitate to agree on the Shiaa areas. I think the insurgency has spread well beyond the triangle. But the level of insurgency is germane, and I'm not prepared to argue that."

Shiaa insurgency does exist witness al sadr but it has different goals. Sunni insurgency is a mixture of varietys of islamist terrorism, baathism and nationalism. The Shiaa wants the US off their back and a right to run their own affairs under an iran like, lighter mullocracy. Sistani and al sadr somehow coexist in this scenario. If we go three state there will be problems in bagdad, kirkuk as emboldened kurds move south and shiaa move to take control of a city that has a majority shiaa population. Of course iran will be helping the shiaa and they probably will prevail if civil war type fighting erupts on border areas. Populations may move from one zone to the other.
Sunnis get their civil war and only God knows if anything good comes from that. Triangle looks on a map like a rump state that has little chance of success. Sunnis may turn out to be next gens shia in iraq if shias and kurds eventually conquer and divide. And then there are bordering states like syria that may expand into western desert regions. mike
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext