SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (70471)9/15/2004 2:24:08 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) of 794309
 
If it turns out that CBS deliberately gave only a single document to 6 experts and 5 said, 'phony as hell' but the 6th said, 'the signature looks okay', and they went with the 6th and suppressed mention of the other 5, then we are not talking about innocent dupes any more.

Not innocent dupes, but possibly still dupes. They can be utterly negligent in their public trust and journalistic ethics without knowing that the memos were fake.

You know, Nadine, we don't know what those experts said. We have no documentation. We're taking their word for it as they "revise and extend" their comments. In my experience they most likely all offered positive or neutral opinions along with caveats and CBS chose to not hear the caveats.

My guess would be that "they" went forward on a plausible deniability wing and a prayer, perhaps subconsciously, and were surprised when it didn't fly.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News