SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who started this subject9/16/2004 9:09:11 PM
From: StockDung   of 12465
 
RE:Advanced Optics Electronics Inc (ADOT) vs John Does. Case dismissed. Court stated the nature of this case bothered the Court.

Case 04-A-486267-C Status CLOSED
Plaintiff Advanced Optics Electronics Inc Attorney Tanner, Mont E.
Defendant Inkogkneeetoe Attorney ## Unknown ##
Judge Cherry, Michael A Dept. 17

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Event 09/15/2004 at 09:00 AM DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS /05
Heard By Cherry, Michael A
Officers Penny Wisner, Court Clerk
Janie Olsen, Reporter/Recorder

Parties 0001 - P1 Advanced Optics Electronics Inc No
004433 Tanner, Mont E. Yes
0002 - D1 Inkogkneeetoe No
0003 - D Proudamerican15 No
0004 - D Athena-Sword No
004367 Rolle, Jonathan Yes
0005 - O Microsoft Corp No

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Rolle presented argument on the motion to dismiss based on lack of
jurisdiction, cited case law to support his position, and stated the proper
forum for this case was New Mexico as the state of Nevada had no contact in
this matter. Response by Mr. Tanner objecting to the jurisdiction argument
and maintaining that Nevada was the proper forum. Mr. Tanner reviewed the
facts of the case for the Court as well as what was happening through
discovery. Court stated the nature of this case bothered the Court. Further
argument by Mr. Rolle. COURT ORDERED, motion to DISMISS GRANTED
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News