ADOT - BIOMODA: Profitable Technology with Purpose Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ADOT - BIOMODA: Profitable Technology with Purpose

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: scion who wrote (4640)	9/16/2004 9:59:22 PM
From: scion	Read Replies (2) of 4650

ADOT is not having any luck with their attempts at intimidation lawsuits. The only thing ADOT has succeeded in doing is drawing a lot of unwanted attention to the company. RE:Advanced Optics Electronics Inc (ADOT) vs John Does. Case dismissed. Court stated the nature of this case bothered the Court. Case 04-A-486267-C Status CLOSED Plaintiff Advanced Optics Electronics Inc Attorney Tanner, Mont E. Defendant Inkogkneeetoe Attorney ## Unknown ## Judge Cherry, Michael A Dept. 17 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Event 09/15/2004 at 09:00 AM DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS /05 Heard By Cherry, Michael A Officers Penny Wisner, Court Clerk Janie Olsen, Reporter/Recorder Parties 0001 - P1 Advanced Optics Electronics Inc No 004433 Tanner, Mont E. Yes 0002 - D1 Inkogkneeetoe No 0003 - D Proudamerican15 No 0004 - D Athena-Sword No 004367 Rolle, Jonathan Yes 0005 - O Microsoft Corp No -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Rolle presented argument on the motion to dismiss based on lack of jurisdiction, cited case law to support his position, and stated the proper forum for this case was New Mexico as the state of Nevada had no contact in this matter. Response by Mr. Tanner objecting to the jurisdiction argument and maintaining that Nevada was the proper forum. Mr. Tanner reviewed the facts of the case for the Court as well as what was happening through discovery. Court stated the nature of this case bothered the Court. Further argument by Mr. Rolle. COURT ORDERED, motion to DISMISS GRANTED Message 20534247

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next