SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: combjelly who wrote (201457)9/17/2004 3:48:13 PM
From: TimF   of 1576861
 
For one, the type face doesn't have to be Times Roman. It could be something else. While the names of the fonts can have a copyright, there is nothing stopping you from designing a similar looking (but not identical) font and calling it something else. Like Bold Face 2.

I think it has been matched to Times New Roman both by the experts and by various non-experts lining up the text to Word's Times New Roman. Either way it doesn't match the database entries for the Selectrics available at or before 1972, or any other typewriter known to be available at the time.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News