Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: GST who wrote (145942)	9/19/2004 4:29:02 PM
From: teevee	of 281500

We are not likely to invade Iran -- and they are likely to have nuclear weapons very soon. Allowing a rogue fundamentalist Islamic state such as Iran to become a nuclear power would be seen as a capitulation and a sign of weakness by every terrorist. Best to make plans for a world in which Iran has nuclear weapons and the ability to use them. Ditto for several other countries who saw what happened to Iraq because they lacked nuclear weapons. I don't believe planning for a terrorist nuclear detonation in North America is a better alternative. The best way for Iran to escape the chaos and ruin of a US invasion is to get the bomb ASAP -- exactly as they are doing. I don't agree. I believe the best way for Iran to avoid an invasion is dismantle their uranium enrichment and weapons programs. Will we invade? Such lunacy is not without a handful of supporters in the US -- and that is all it seems to take to start a war these days. That decision is up to the fundamentalist Islamic mulahs who run Iran. While we debate this absurd issue, terrorist are busy scouring Russia for nukes and nuke capability -- and they just might succeed. Putin won't let that happen.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next