SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Orcastraiter who wrote (17403)9/23/2004 10:33:34 AM
From: mph   of 90947
 
Let's examine your statements.

You say Rather was "duped" by a forged document and
then compare this with Bush and Cheney being "duped"
by a forged document regarding uranium from Niger.

First, my criticism of Rather was that he didn't
undertake the type of analysis regarding the
documents that would be dictated by any kind of
journalistic standards. He also ignored advices from
at least a couple of document experts who questioned
the authenticity of the documents before they were aired.
Instead, he relied on a handwriting expert who admittedly
did not vouch for the authenticity of the documents
but analyzed only some signatures. (That expert also
knew he was looking at generations old photocopies and
his own writings indicate that a valid analysis requires
access to originals. Burkett has since claimed that
he destroyed the originals, which should raise a red
flag to anyone.)

His producer Mapes engaged in similarly questionable
conduct.

The documents at issue were purportedly 30 years old
and from the personal file of a man deceased for 20
years.

Anyone with half a brain would realize that authenticating
such documents so long after the fact would be difficult.
Why would anyone even have them? is one question that comes
readily to mind.

Bottom line: if Rather were "duped" as you say, it's
because he wanted the documents to be valid and therefore
failed to take appropriate measures to be sure. He even
personally vouched for the documents when he knew he had
no legitimate basis on which to do so. A reporter/
journalist has control over the sources he uses for his
story and can comply with journalistic standards before airing the story.
Sure it's possible for a reporter to
be "duped", but I'll only give him the benefit of the
doubt if he followed a reasonable mode of inquiry. Rather
did not because he did not want to. Simple as that.

I'm unclear as to your reference to Niger documents. Is
that something you picked up from Joe Wilson? If so,
Wilson's interpretation of the Niger/uranium situation
was debunked by the CIA, as I recall. I can't remember
if that was part of the 9/11 report, but it may have
been in that context that I read about. Got a link for
your reference?

I don't think it's a fair comparison to evaluate what
a president/V.P. make of current foreign documents in
the same way you evaluate a reporter's story. The Chief
Executive must rely on intelligence from many sources.
He can't be involved in personally conducting the
investigation or talking to sources. He has to rely
on an enormous bureaucracy to collect and evaluate
copious intelligence.

Folks like you also claimed that Bush failed to stop
9/11 based on oblique intelligence about terrorists
using airplanes. Exactly what he could have done in
light of that generalized information has never been
satisfactorily explained.

However, here, you're complaining that he acted on
information that turned out to be wrong.

Intelligence and dealing with foreign countries/
terrorists is no exact science.

Your attempt at a comparison here holds no water
IMO. Nice try, though. :-)

btw, I hope CBS doesn't nudge out Rather. He's shown
his true colors(i.e. bias) and therefore can be
used as a barometer in that regard. His credibility
is shot. No wonder CBS sought Burkett who had similarly
been discredited in the past. Blew up in their faces.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext