SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Pluvia vs. Westergaard

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: brad greene who wrote (309)8/26/1997 8:04:00 PM
From: Pullin-GS   of 1267
 
Westergaard covers small cap concept stocks.
You don't say....I like an investor who does his duedilly.

More go bad....than turn into 20 baggers.
You are just with the program today! You get a silver star!

You need to understand this.
Thanks for making this so very clear. You are a true stock wiz!

You have turned a $ 5,000 reward for information leading to the identity of Pluvia.......Into hiring a hit man to silence you.
Do you always read things in such a litteral sense?

Really.....
I take that as a yes? I thought so.

Many recent posts are emotional, graphic, and full of outrage.
You noticed! You get a gold star now!

Fine....get it out of your system. Then calm down.
Must have missed my prozak....sorry, it won't happen again. ;-)

If Westergaard believes that he is speaking to nothing more than an angy mob who just wants to call him names and blow off some steam, then I think you will find that he will choose not to participate.
That would have been a wise choice from the start....to just drop the whole thing. I'm glad you see things my way. ;-)

You will then call him a coward and say you won.....
Can't beat up the beaten. You are talking in future tense.

I hope that does not happen.
I would expect nothing less.

To a large extent, it depends upon the tone of the posts. Anyone who puts out a position here must have at least a small expectation that their position will be considered.
As I did. I did not ask for your opinion. You may consider my position...but to put it in your words...please keep the clutter out...starting with your own post to me.

If people won't listen, why speak? Nobody is forced to agree.....but listening is common courtesy.
Just what is your point? Your rambling.

There may be a side to this thing that you have not considered.
Such as?

Take a look at the click rate on this thread....
Your drifting again...just what is your point? What does "click rate" (ROFL) have to do with my post?

..It may drop off of the board by the time I get this post up. It has been in slow decline since it started.
Your at it again. Snap out of it!

Without Westergaard..and a few others..It would just be a bunch screaming and yelling....and be gone in two days. I hate threads that just scream and yell.
Please feel free to leave anytime. We will all miss your very valuable contributions.

I would deal with Westergaard.
I would expect you would.

So mark my vote down as a Hell yes.
Noted.

I don't think Westergaard will loose any business over this.
You really hav'nt a clue.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext