Proof that John Kerry is Unfit for Command Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Proof that John Kerry is Unfit for Command

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: cirrus who wrote (12207)	9/26/2004 9:42:57 PM
From: Ann Corrigan	Read Replies (1) of 27181

cirrus, your remarks below prove you are not really a political moderate. You cannot nuance, fine tune, "do the little things" when it comes to neutralizing the barbaric Islamic terrorists who have declared war on the USA. They respect only one thing--the steely resolve of an American President to eliminate them which is stronger than their sworn determination to kill us. That's why John Kerry would be dangerous in the White House. He habitually straddles every issue & never takes a strong stand on anything. That's exactly the wrong attitude for an American president. John Kerry would do nothing differently at the borders than Pres Bush. Democrats in Congress are afraid they'll lose the Spanish vote if they tighten border security. Republicans don't want to PO a large portion of their voting base by stopping the flow of dirt-cheap illegal labor. American workers are being screwed by both political parties on that issue. Neither candidate intends to make changes because they know Congress will not cooperate. Jimmy Carter tried to be a more "sensitive" President & the USA became the laughing stock of the world. Pres Clinton overlooked OBL's growing strength and as a result over 3000 Americans died on Sept 11. GW Bush on the other hand responded to that terrorist attack with the speed & strength that's required. If the USA starts nuancing every situation & issue with Kerry's indecisive management style...it would spell disaster for the American public. ******************************************************** <<<A vote for Kerry is not a vote for Islamic extremism. A vote for Kerry means we will wage physical war when necessary, but we will also wage an intellectual war against the radical Islamic schools in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan that brainwash kids into the ways of radical fundamentalism. We need to get to the next generation before the the fundamentalists, otherwise the war on terror will never end. The simple Bush approach - kill them - does nothing to address the long term causes of terrorism except help their recruiting drives. A vote for Kerry means we will do the little things that pay big dividends - making sure FBI agents in Arizona and Minnesota are heard when they raise terror warning flags, for example. A vote for Kerry means we will controlling our borders by denying work to illegal aliens - the DOJ has brought only 13 suits last year against firms for employing illegals - while 4,000 illegals cross the border every day from Mexico. How many are terrorists? A vote for Kerry means another attempt to settle the Israel/Palestinian issue, which Bush ignored for the first half of his term. The world is not a simple place, and while Bush's simple solutions are appealing, they are dangerous because of what they overlook.>>>

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next