The problem is Iraq was caused by many things. After kicking the terrorists out of Afghanistan, they needed to go somewhere. For many the logical landing point was to go where they could best benefit the cause of evil. The easiest place to confront the forces of good is in Iraq. The borders are very porous. Iranians will support those who confront good. There is much confusion. Where there is confusion, it is much easier to hide in plain sight.
According to Bush (in an interview with the independent Bill O'Reilly) Alawali said that after a police or military recruiting or training site is terrorized, more recruits show up the next day. It says a lot about the resolve of the Iraqi people. They want a Westernized democracy.
As I see it, the problem with a true multinational police force is big egos. Ike had the same problem with Monty in WW II. Everyone wants to be perceived as being in control. With the current arrangement, we have a clear directive. Each force is responsible for their region, and reports to the US and the Iraqi.
Based on the range of stories coming out of Iraq, it appears that there are many different feelings in different parts of the country. The Sunnis are already missing control. The Shiites may be playing us, or may be happy to be able to share control. The Kurds want a separate state, but seem willing to accept the unlikelihood of that outcome. The Sunni Triangle and Sadir City seem to harbor much resentment towards America, and the whole liberation. Foreign terrorists are becoming increasingly effective at working with the locals.
As I have said before in other posts, the chaos resembles gangster-controlled areas of US cities during prohibition.
Someone needs to lock up all of the gangsters, or kill them. The moral authority within the country needs to condemn violence that reduces freedoms. The people who want to be free need to stand up to the bullies.
It is helpful to recall that there has been a repressive dictatorship ruling for a very long time. People who were brave are now dead. Even Saddam could not eliminate bravery, but his thugs beat it out of many potential righteous soles.
Now explain to me why I wasted my time on a person who would say, "I believe Bush's postwar neocon plan screwed up the country so badly that the Iraqis didn't get it, thought we were screwing with them deliberately, and now see us as the problem."
In response to your statement, "We don't want to do what we did in Vietnam, which was to draw the nationalistic elements to the other side." What we did in Vietname according to the Vietnamese was encorage the North Vienamese who were on the verge of collapse and surrender to keep on going. They took heart from people like Clinton and Kerry. |
