SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Legacy Interface Discussion (2004-2011)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Eric L who wrote (1581)9/28/2004 2:54:23 PM
From: Bill Ulrich  Read Replies (1) of 6035
 
Hi Eric,

That's some helpful info. Didn't realize there were many who read from 40+-inch distances. That's a new factor I should plug into my own design calcs. The key point in my argument towards limited width flexibility is the word count per line (or "length of line"). Not that a widely variable box is *bad* per se, but generally it's secondary to (and potentially inhibits) good word-per-line count. Perhaps both could be accomodated.

Do you do a lot of reading on larger, article-oriented sites like New York Times, WSJ, Washington Post, Foreign Affairs, Nat'l Geo, or others? If so, do some work better for you than others?

-MrB
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext