SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jttmab who wrote (146563)9/29/2004 12:37:11 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
If that's not enough, look at the policies of the Administration around the world. We certainly are not terribly troubled of the thousands are currently being raped, murdered, or displaced in Darfur

What exactly do you want? We have noticed those troubles, indeed we have forced those troubles to the notice of the UN, which did not want to notice them. The UN is doing what it usually does, nothing. But we're bing good little multilateral boys and girls on that one, having our hands full elsewhere with more pressing problems. We don't feel inclined to do regime change in the Sudan, which is what real progress would take, as you know perfectly well, since the crisis in Darfur is entirely government-engineered.

What is the rule you operate by, it is imperative for the US to charge in unilaterally into other countries to do regime change if and only if we have no interests involved?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News