Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: brian1501 who wrote (204544)	10/1/2004 1:26:57 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) of 1572724

I have to agree Ten. Bush had many opportunities to take Kerry down and instead reverted to his overall (repetative) message. I think he went back to it too often and should have hung Kerry on facts/his previous statements more. Bush did not articulate properly how Iraq fits into the war on terror and he let Kerry portray the simplistic "Osama attacked us, not Saddam". It would have been easy for him to explain that Afghanistan was a direct result of 9/11, and Iraq is a result of the change in paradigm caused by 9/11. He didn't do that. There is nothing simplistic about the notion that Osama attacked us, not Saddam. In fact, it requires some complexity to recognize that Saddam Hussein does not equal Osama. And it requires further complexity to understand that the Chechen terrorists and Hamas, although Muslim, do not equal al Qa'ida. If we can't distinguish between these groups, we will encourage them to join forces against us and make what is a difficult fight just that much harder. ted

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next