Microvision (MVIS) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Microvision (MVIS)

MVIS 0.854

+0.4%

Jan 26 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: kili who wrote (424)	8/27/1997 9:04:00 AM
From: David Rodella	of 7721

A few recent comments from this thread:- wfrazee: "sold most at 13 1/8" Toby Cyr: "sell now" (Toby earlier told us he sold at $7) Roderick Ciferri: "Short at 13 1/2" Jan A Van Hummel: "ought to be jittery" Kim: "nervous", "sold a few shares under $9" Jay D: "I'd sell" Stuart Theakston: "everytime it does this (i.e. has a good day) I sell a little" Michael Tantleff: "moving on hype" Jonathan Bartlett: "price of stock dosn't make sense" (stock at $13) OldHack: wants "indication technology is commercially viable before I buy back in" wfrazee: "sold (part of position) and I hope it goes there (i.e. under $6) again" I have to ask, where is that irrational exuberance that Greenspan was so worried about? And where are the "momentum" players the Dow Wire Service cited? If they are individuals, why don't we see some of them on this thread? If MVIS has been broadly hyped to the "crowd", why is this thread still largely populated by us veterans of the dark months? Is this fast becoming a thread of former MVIS holders and interested bystanders?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next