>>Everyone on those boards is anonymous, worse often posters push an agenda and post under multiple aliases etc.<<
Some of us have actually met Wilder; I doubt he would try to pass himself off as an expert, but I also gain from his posts. Further, posting under multiple aliases on SI is kind of difficult and gets expensive.
>>As I said before, I have nothing against the guy but his answer to my inquiry was somewhat condescending which is ok if it contained any relevant information. Come to find out he did not even listen to the Dr. Speech.<<
OK, he didn't listen to the presentation, and perhaps didn't add much with that particular post; sorry you got offended. As for belligerence, indeed, parsing a few posts of yours, I don't find a history of being more than a bit direct at times. Anyway, perhaps you could summarize the presentation for those of us who may not have time to listen (one of the great things about these boards)? Did it contain anything worth while about clinical outcomes versus IC?
That would be much appreciated.
TIA & Cheers, Tuck |
