SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: GST who wrote (146987)10/5/2004 12:19:03 AM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
And you know the securing of Russian nukes is lagging because of Bush administration stinginess, I suppose.

Now the USSR fell before the current Bush adminstration came into office and, let's see, before the Clinton administration came into office. Do you know what was the problem back during the long, glorious 8 years between the two Bush administrations? Surely, you'd think if it was all just an issue of US priorities, the Clinton administration would have gotten the job handled then - I mean we had Richard Clarke on the job in those days. Any comments on how this problem was dealt with before W came along?

t makes my blood boil to hear the baloney about Saddam as a nuclear threat when we face a real and imminent threat from the former Soviet Union.

"If you don't believe ... Saddam Hussein is a threat with nuclear weapons, then you shouldn't vote for me." -- John Kerry, USA Today on 2/13/03
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News