SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (147068)10/6/2004 6:48:05 AM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Yes, Clinton could have and should have done more to secure nuclear materials in Russia. If Clinton was President it would be worth debating his fitness for another four years -- but he is not President. Bush is President and he is asking for four more years. But in the last four years his national security track record is shameful. Bush is unfit to lead the US and his diversion of our military on a fool's errand in Iraq while the pace of securing the real threats -- like Russian nukes -- drags along leaving us more vulnerable by the day.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News