SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Materials No-Politics Thread (AMAT)
AMAT 319.19+5.7%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (11618)10/7/2004 2:30:02 AM
From: etchmeister  Read Replies (1) of 25522
 
Not sure how far they have come, but I read an article about a year ago about how the companies you mentioned were woefully behind in remote diagnostics.

Brian;
I don't think so at all

About 20 years ago the Lam AutoEtch 480 (480 = For The Eigthies)had a modem allowing to operate/troubleshoot the tool remotely.
Somebody in Fremont could troubleshoot a tool located in Korea via modem.

There were already counters for wafers cycled and RF minutes (RF minutes = processing time while the wafer is being etched).
Later they developed software to monitor every parameter like gas flow, RF power, valve angle , pretty much everything.
That was about 15 years ago and I've lost track over the last four years or so.

The next step is to get metrology inline -
monitor critical parameters (not tool parameters) in real for every wafer.
In the old days they would check every 25 or 50 wafers or even once a shift.
Loosing a 300mm is just to expensive which means check every wafer.
Again increasing complexity becomes a growth driver for certain segments - in particualar metrology and defect inspection.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext