SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Alan Smithee who wrote (75477)10/7/2004 9:03:59 PM
From: ManyMoose  Read Replies (1) of 793691
 
I could go for that, except it would give the lefties all the good timber land and they don't have a clue about its highest value to the totality of the earth's ecosystems. In other words, if we grow timber where it REALLY grows, then the rest of the world can have MORE wilderness and everybody still gets to build a house. Their way, they take the best timber land on earth and make it so expensive that it's just easier to go get tropical hardwoods in some third world country with little or no forestry expertise.

Message #75477 from Alan Smithee at 10/7/2004 12:07:37 PM

There is some merit to the thought of combining Washington and Oregon, then splitting them into two states using the Cascades as the border (I'd actually prefer using I-5 <ggg>).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News