SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jlallen who wrote (147519)10/10/2004 7:33:30 PM
From: Michael Watkins  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
.in fact the President dealt with a gathering threat....and the world is better off for it...

Incorrect.

The report confirms what all now suspect - that Hussein was impotent.

At the time of the invasion, Saddam had less capability than he had 10 years prior. Far less. Gulf War I, Sanctions, No-Fly Zone, and vigillance kept Saddam contained. The report confirms that containment worked.

The report confirms that he was losing capability, not regaining it.

Now the Bush administration and GW himself, left with nothing else to hang their stetsons on, is making pronouncements on Saddam's "intent".

Left with no hard facts (no stock piles, no factories, no labs, no centrifuge parts, no NOTHING) Bush is reduced to telling us in colourful language that Saddam was bad, and wanted to be badder, despite no ability to become the world threatening meanie he wanted to be.

Meanwhile, any smart terrorist has probably used the massive distraction of the past two years to plan something nasty and for all we know is in the middle of executing their plan.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext