The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread.

QCOM 152.72

-0.2%

Jan 28 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jackmore who wrote (6917)	10/10/2004 8:36:54 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) of 12253

They don't mention refueling in their descriptions. I suspect they are going to do a bad job of designing them. Presumably because the thought of liquid fuel causes paranoia and the idea of people topping up their fuel cell like they refill their car's fuel tank is considered too dangerous. 100 ml of methanol is a lot less dangerous than 80 litres of petrol. It seems that fuel cells have a way to go before they are running mobile cyberspace. Lithium ion batteries recharge quite quickly and if the fuel cell people make it too hard, people would as well carry spare lithium ion batteries. Mqurice PS: Yes, it was a rhetorical question about Samsung's success with CDMA [and the implied question about why there is so much whining from Koreans about CDMA royalties].

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next