Nadine...everywhere I read current Iraq and nuclear material, I keep seeing the name of David Albright. He evidently is very critical of the Bush Adm, from what I've seen. He never did think there WMD in Iraq, and now wonders what has happened to the nuclear materials that were there. (Isn't nuclear material considered to be part of WMD, even if the pieces weren't put together yet???)
Here's what I've found, all with his name involved, just in the last couple of weeks or so....
If his group and the others were so very concerned that anything was missing that they said was in Iraq a year ago, why didn't they bring it up until now...???
Big investigative "hit piece" by the NYT. Cheney and Rice lied! Timed for "guess what?"
October 3, 2004 How the White House Embraced Disputed Iraqi Arms Intelligence By DAVID BARSTOW, WILLIAM J. BROAD and JEFF GERTH
Message 20594149
Institute for Science and International Security
8888888888888888888 And this link - re David Albright Message 20595067
8888888888888888
This today: re David Albright
Bomb count: India 55-110, Pak 55-90
TIMES NEWS NETWORK[ TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2004 11:55:16 PM ] timesofindia.indiatimes.com
WASHINGTON: Pakistan may have caught up with India in the amount of destructive nuclear power it can summon, according to a new assessment by a Washington think tank.
88888888888888
Posted 10/12/2004 10:36 PM
Looting of factory machinery in Iraq raises alarms By John Diamond, USA TODAY WASHINGTON — The Bush administration said Tuesday that it will investigate reports that equipment with possible nuclear weapons applications was looted after the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.<<<<< usatoday.com 88888888888888
Sunday, October 10, 2004 - Page updated at 12:00 A.M.
Close-up Plutonium: Is it really in safe hands?
By Mark Clayton The Christian Science Monitor
seattletimes.nwsource.com
888888888888888888888
And from Left of center France, this:
Saturday 9th October 2004 : The Iraq War Was Always Based On Lies 3 comment(s). by Jason Leopold bellaciao.org |