Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (77172)	10/13/2004 3:27:14 PM
From: aladin	of 793885

Karen, I find it interesting, though, that folks who won't take up arms for what they consider Bush's unnecessary war get heaped with scorn hereabouts. Yet folks who would lay down their arms rather than continue to serve under Kerry even though the enemy is still a threat are supported by the thread. Why is that? Seems to me that each is simply deciding for himself what is worth his personal sacrifice. Its not that simple. If all the left did was not volunteer to be in the army - no scorn given, but they also denigrate those who choose to serve and their cause... I suspect that UW is right that in the WOT a lot of GI's will not re-up under Kerry. However, they will not turn around and beat up GI's who do serve or spit on them or denigrate that they choose to serve or question why. As a result we will get attacked and in an ultimate irony we will get a draft. John

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next