SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Michael Watkins who wrote (148067)10/15/2004 5:07:41 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
There are two sides, as they say, and the article refers to material appearing in the New York Times and the Washington Post. Look, I am not very interested in this discussion, but have carried it on as a courtesy. I think that I will stop, given your belligerence. It would not matter if there were something hincty about Feith or others involved in this office, the CIA said that the case for war was a slam- dunk, even the Energy Department thought that Saddam was working on a nuclear program, despite disagreement on the rods, and none of this reflects on the upper reaches of the Administration, however hard you try to insinuate it does.........
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News