SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rainy_Day_Woman who wrote (646483)10/17/2004 3:25:57 PM
From: E  Read Replies (2) of 769670
 
You think the tee shirt picture "looks like his shoulder blade"?

What can one say to a statement so odd. Except look at it again. If it's a shoulder blade, it has escaped from its home in his body.

salon.com

Do you think this one looks like his spine? (Scroll down almost to the bottom.)

digbysblog.blogspot.com

I'd appreciate your saying so, if you do.

In fact, everyone reading this who wants to say that they think those two photos look like a shoulder blade and a spine (plus a lichee nut or something that must have fallen down his collar, but what's a bump between friends?) raise your hand!

and by question imply and implicate that Bush wears devices at even casual encounters with the press

RDW! Can you be so naive as to think that there is such a thing as a "casual encounter with the press" (and its cameras and notebooks) when you are a presidential candidate and every word you say is -- your handlers are aware -- liable to appear next morning as a headline? Particularly when it's George Bush?

The entities in the photos above, and in many others, which to you are invisible, are not comparable to the pen Kerry took out of his pocket that you brought into the discussion when you re-raised this issue.

GZ says both Bush and Kerry broke the rules by using their own pens. Why are you raising this pen thing again, unless to conflate their violating the pen rule (I assume they just forgot) with the possibility of Bush getting his lines or prompts fed to him by parties unknown?

And not just at debates, either.

I guess that I know now why the WH says there's nothing under his clothing. Because those who want to deny the evidence of their eyes (and in some cases, ears) will go along with them.

It will be "very little" when those photographs and the voice that gives George's lines before he repeats them with the exact same inflections, even, are acknowledged and explained. Until then, you don't know whether it's "very little," or an extremely bizarre and unprecedented series of events in American History.

Some day, there will be an answer. It will not be that the thing under the tee shirt and suit in the photos at the links above are body parts, though, RDW.

P.S.

myleftbrain.com

(I think that anything after a link is getting bolded and underlined....)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext