SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (207258)10/18/2004 9:55:25 AM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (1) of 1585686
 
Then you still haven't explained why Kerry came to the same conclusions on the same intelligence.

Yes I did - it wasn't his primary job. He's was a little Senator from Massachusettes. The President of the USA was the President of the USA.

I think I had a post earlier stating that Kerry did come to the wrong conclusion on WMDs in Iraq, but his error is less important that Bush's because a)he probably had access to or at least looked at less intelligence than the President, and b) he is not the one that determined to take action based on the incorrect intelligence assessment. Bush did.

Kerry's failure in regard to the WMD conclusion is that he was one of 100 incorrect checks in the Senate, and he bears that responsibility.

Bush's failure in the WMD assessment is that he lead the country into war based on inaccurate information.

There are no circumstances where you could admit you are wrong.

Nonsense, if I were wrong I'd admit it.

Bush's error in misdiagnosing the WMD situation in Iraq is much worse than Kerry's error in believing Bush, don't you think? What the hell is leadership about, if not taking responsibility for your leadership decisions actions?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext