SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mike Johnston who wrote (24651)10/19/2004 11:15:21 AM
From: independentRead Replies (2) of 306849
 
IMHO:

Mark,

"If i am a first time homebuyer i would rather pay 200 K for a house at 8% interest rate with 40 K downpayment than pay 500 K for the same house with 100 K downpayment and 5% rate.
Thus it is not a homebuyer that benefits from low interest rates, it is the seller who is getting an extra 300 K. Also i would rather buy at my leisure, than compete with dozens of desperados or flippers who buy without inspection."

I totally agree with your statement. If people only did their own math, they would realize that they are in fact paying MORE. No, imho, its not more affordable than ever to buy real estate; its the opposite. Ditto for loan consolidations.

It seems most are only looking at the lower interest rates but don't bother to look at the principal or the term. Also, it seems most websites these days have a PAYMENT CALCULATOR but not an INTEREST CALCULATOR. Hmmm, I wonder why?

Here in the Twin Cities metro in MINNESOTA, it seems people I come across, have at least 2 if not 3 additional properties aside from their shelter. Its no wonder that in the city I live in, the average home price is around $500,000.

The reason given by most is population growth and scant building but it seems there are more and more multi-unit buildings that I see and read about? It seems population growth has stalled because its now more expensive to live here. The cost of living here is just about as expensive as Chicago BUT Chicago has more amenities, more choices and much better transportation system and warmer too!!

Yes, the MINNESOTA is also OVERPRICED but probably not as overpriced as Boston, Orange County, San Diego, or San Francisco.

One particular family I met (Dad, Mom & Son), had four properties between the three of them. It makes me wonder if the tighter supply is the result of these so called, "investors". Just last week, I read that the number of available supply has increased by 36%. Interesting...

They can have all the houses they want. As a renter here, I would not want to pay for OVERPRICED housing in MINNESOTA where it gets very humid during Summer and gets down to -20f during WINTER.

Paying for both air conditioning during Summer (2 months) and heat for 6 months is not CHEAP. This is not to mention the extra upkeep on houses and cars around here because of the extreme humidity and extreme COLD.

Its almost cheaper to live in California, LOL! At least you don't have the upkeep and the 6 months of heating costs!

I'm thinking of moving to a more reasonably priced and warmer metro eventually.

Just my two cents....
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext