SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elroy who wrote (207533)10/19/2004 11:50:09 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) of 1574785
 
Well the oil for food scandal was not "our actions" gone wrong, it was the UN's inability to manage large programs

It WOULD have been our actions gone wrong had Kerry been in office. Why can you not see this obvious fact?

As to "listening" to someone else's view, sure, I have no problem with it. But you don't allow entities with interests adverse to yours to make your decisions for you.

France and Russia had interests adverse to ours at the time the decision was made. This makes it indisputable that Bush's decision to move without UN approval was the correct one. You can argue that we shouldn't have gone to war, and you may be able to make a logical case. But you cannot make a sensible case that Bush made a bad decision by moving when the UNSC blocked us.

You're reasoning ability is worse than Kerry's. Your argument is hilariously weak.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News