SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: benwood who wrote (13663)10/19/2004 2:09:04 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (2) of 116555
 
One plunge of FAX was triggered a rights offering to sell new shares for sub-market value. As KT pointed out at the time, rights offerings are designed to benefit the management, not the shareholders. FAX management backed off after a lawsuit was filed by a major stockholder. Perhaps this is the incident to which you are referring? It was about a 20% haircut as I recall.

That is indeed the incident.
Why would anyone choose to purposely screw shareholders this way?
Obviously it benefitted management in some way.
What a crock of horse shit.
a 20% loss overnight in a bond fund with no interest rate or currency moves is preposterous. If they were prone to do this again I would not do business with them.

Mish
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext