USHG / Ionatron Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : USHG / Ionatron

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 PreviousNext

From: big-joe_5216	10/19/2004 9:49:42 PM
	of 41

Short Sellers & Howard's Past To be fair to the short sellers concerning past and present, I include this link: Message 20151578 There is a rash of rumors/lies/misinformation and smear campaigning ongoing on various other message boards. To be fair, even more than fair to people that would continue promoting such garbage I want to include a link to this story: Court Upholds $480,000 Verdict Against Reporter For Publication of ''Rumor'' "A public figure whose libel claim failed could still recover damages for false light invasion of privacy arising from publication of a false ''rumor'' about his purported criminal past, a federal district court has ruled. (Howard v. Antilla, March 30, 2001.) The ruling leaves intact a $480,000 jury verdict against a reporter for The New York Times. The court's ruling is a reminder that even the truthful, unbiased reporting of allegations does not necessarily insulate a reporter from liability....." gannett.com This decision was latter reversed citing First Amendment violations. gannett.com Prospective bashers, be forwarned, it must have cost a lot of money for both sides. But newspapers have a lot of money.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 PreviousNext