SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jttmab who wrote (148274)10/20/2004 10:43:18 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
A job is not your life, and is easy to walk away from, so I cannot, off hand, think of anything comparable. Maybe you can enlighten me.

For the rest, it is just confirmation that the women are close to chattel, insofar as they do not have an effective voice in their own household and its composition. Furthermore, without a marriage, there is no commingling of assets, so at least the women gets to take out of the arrangement that property which had always belonged to her, including a separate bank account, so it is not necessary to have a court intervene in the division of assets.

If the man wants to provide for survivors, he can, through simple testamentary disposition. In the absence of a will, whatever children there are have a claim in addition to the legal wife. For a childless woman, well, at least she was under no illusion, as might be with a childless wife, who is an afterthought after taking care of the children in the disposition of assets, which will ordinarily not be large.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext