Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neocon who wrote (148284)	10/20/2004 1:27:07 PM
From: Michael Watkins	Read Replies (1) of 281500

You are quoting a report from 2002, with quotes from "Charlie" whose latest report repudiates virtually all claims he once made. He's an insider or would not have been placed in the public eye in 2002 and now in 2004. Why should anything he has to say have any weight here and now? Why should we put any faith in circumstantial evidence as arranged by Bush admin insiders? Is he a nuclear expert? No. Is Dr. Wood? Yes. Current evidence continues to support the claim that Bush asked for specific data to justify invasion and they manufactured a case, custom built.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next