past behavior
before everything changed and he was beaten in a war AND contained
and we know he was contained, because the reports say he was contained...
but you still really really believe that evidence doesn't matter
hmmm
yeah
I call that more of the same
He did NOT retain the programs, there was no evidence of them- no "tangible evidence"- and his retaining the "intentions" to restart the programs is just silly. If you are going to start going to war over intentions- you should probably kiss your behind goodbye now. No, I have no faith- not in you, not in Saddam, and certainly not in Bush. When there is no evidence for something, it usually is not there. That's logic. Pretending that the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence is highly illogical, and goes against probability. You are a cheerleader for the war. You "believe" that SAddam was a threat even though he clearly was not- and you STILL believe it even though it is completely clear he had no weapons, and was contained. What can you say to that? You "believe" based on past behavior (which led to the war, and the decimation of his country) that the same thing is going to happen- even though there appears no shred of evidence that it could have- although Saddam had the intention (dream?) of doing it all again. Yes, Brumar,continue to sing in your choir of heavenly preemptive war. You don't need logic, you have faith. |
