"implicate the US gov't in 911"
When one looks at all the "facts" and everything that happened and did not happen that allowed 911 to take place, it is very hard NOT to believe that the gov't was involved. HOWEVER, with as many reporters, both low-profile AND high-profile, and with leaks, and with an election coming up, if there were ANY proof of this, would we not see Kerry, or Dan Rather, or SOMEONE making these allegations? If you believe that the gov't DID participate, you also have to believe that BOTH parties, including Kerry, are also involved, and that people like Dan Rather are also involved OR they all fear for their lives if they speak out. Which is it? No one, except a few, pessimistic, crazy gold investors like us will even give it the time of day if it only shows up on the internet and in a few books by obscure authors.
It's very hard to believe that a whole host of reporters and politicians will attack Bush on just about ANY subject, yet will not touch this 911 thing IF there was ANY good, hard evidence.
I understand this book's (Crossing the Rubicon) point is on the "peak oil" premise, yet how can we take that seriously if he also espouses this 911 conspiracy stuff and NO ONE credible will come forward to back it up? Thoughts anyone?
I remain,
SOROS |
