SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mishedlo who wrote (20630)10/25/2004 8:57:27 AM
From: glenn_a  Read Replies (3) of 110194
 
Mish.

Thanks for the alternative view on the Pentagon crash.

Just to clarify re: the Pentagon crash is not whether a plane flew into the Pentagon, but rather whether a 757 flew into the Pentagon, a plane weighing 80 tons.

I do appreciate the alternative case. I think there is an attraction (or repulsion) to "conspiracy theories" that can make them very emotional arguments where evidence is "massaged" to fit one's preexisting point of view.

For me, the most surreal thing is that a passenger plane could ever fly into the Pentagon in the first place, particularly when the US military and airspace would have been on high alert as it was approx 50 minutes after the first plane flew into the World Trade Centers. Just too incredible for my skeptical mind. But, that's just me.

Re: the crash remains, it does not look to me like the crash site of a 757. But, I'm not expert on the matter.

Regards,
Glenn
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News